Lack of Meaningful Free Choice?

In Gatton v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Gatton entered into a cell phone service contract with T-Mobile. Under the standard form, no-negotiation contract, Gatton waived any right to participate in a class action against T-Mobile.

However, Gatton could have entered into a service contract with other cell phone providers who did not require waiving the right to participate in a class action.

Under the approach of Hennigsen, there as a lack of meaningful free choice in the contract formation process between Gatton and T-Mobile.

Yes

No

It depends. Is it enough for a meaningful free choice to exist that Gatton had the option to enter into a contact with another cell phone provider who did not prohibit participation in class actions?