Damages and 2-508(2)
Suppose that Wright cures by delivering - on November 3 - pink, beige, and blue shoestrings, which had also caught on as bracelets, and were just as popular as the red, white, and blue shoestrings.
Sowle has conclusive proof that, had the shoe strings been delivered as promised on November 2, he would have sold the entire shipment to a buyer who would have paid him twice what he ended up making by selling the shoe strings on November 3 and after.
Assuming the loss was foreseeable at the time of contracting, Sowle should be able to recover the loss as consequential damages. The situation is the same as with 2-508(1), discussed earlier. If Wright had not cured, Sowle could have recovered and would be entitled to 2-712 damages: cover price minus contract price plus incidental and consequential damages less expenses saved. Where Wright does cure, Sowle should still be entitled to incidental and consequential damages.
As noted in discussing the same issue in regard to 2-508(1), the UCC does not directly provide for such a recovery in any specific section; courts will, however, still award the damages.